[GRADLE-732] configurations.archives does not include default jar in java plugin Created: 10/Nov/09 Updated: 10/Feb/17 Resolved: 10/Feb/17 |
|
Status: | Resolved |
Project: | Gradle |
Affects Version/s: | 0.8 |
Fix Version/s: | None |
Type: | Bug | ||
Reporter: | Philip Crotwell | Assignee: | Unassigned |
Resolution: | Won't Fix | Votes: | 7 |
Description |
In a java project, configurations.archives does not contain the generated jar for the current project. The user guide seems to indicate here: task makeSodSite(dependsOn: jar) << { task -> But it doesn't work, with a NoClassDefFoundError. I put in a few and found that runtime and default seem to be identical and archives is empty. Adam Murdoch said... |
Comments |
Comment by Hans Dockter [ 19/Apr/10 ] |
This is the ivy way of seeing the world. At the moment we just pass this on as the Gradle behavior. If you are within a module, the published artifacts are not part of the resolve. We don't think this is the way it should be and we will fix it for 1.0. |
Comment by Andrew Phillips [ 06/Oct/11 ] |
We're using the following (unimaginative ) workaround, and it appears to do the trick: from configurations.runtime // include main artifact - see http://issues.gradle.org/browse/GRADLE-732 from "${jar.archivePath}" I guess in your case you'd be appending "${jar.archivePath}" to whatever classpath you're constructing for the Ant task. |
Comment by Benjamin Muschko [ 15/Nov/16 ] |
As announced on the Gradle blog we are planning to completely migrate issues from JIRA to GitHub. We intend to prioritize issues that are actionable and impactful while working more closely with the community. Many of our JIRA issues are inactionable or irrelevant. We would like to request your help to ensure we can appropriately prioritize JIRA issues you’ve contributed to. Please confirm that you still advocate for your JIRA issue before December 10th, 2016 by:
We look forward to collaborating with you more closely on GitHub. Thank you for your contribution to Gradle! |
Comment by Benjamin Muschko [ 10/Feb/17 ] |
Thanks again for reporting this issue. We haven't heard back from you after our inquiry from November 15th. We are closing this issue now. Please create an issue on GitHub if you still feel passionate about getting it resolved. |