[GRADLE-3244] Ivy modules with negative dependency configuration mappings fail to resolve Created: 17/Feb/15  Updated: 10/Feb/17  Resolved: 10/Feb/17

Status: Resolved
Project: Gradle
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Bug
Reporter: Gary Hale Assignee: Unassigned
Resolution: Won't Fix Votes: 0


 Description   

Between Gradle 1.6 and Gradle 1.7, Ivy modules that have negative dependency configuration mappings no longer resolve. For instance:

<configurations defaultconfmapping="test->;default->,!test;%->*,!test">
<conf name="test" extends="default"/>
<conf name="default"/>
</configurations>

Results in:

Execution failed for task ':dependencies'.
> Could not resolve all dependencies for configuration ':compile'.
> Module version xxx:yyy:5.63.0, configuration 'default' declares a dependency on configuration '*!test' which is not declared in the module descriptor for net.sourceforge.cobertura:cobertura:1.9

This issue was reported at: http://forums.gradle.org/gradle/topics/gradle-2-3-ivy-configuration-mapping-makes-dependencies-resolution-to-fail-test

A test project can be found at: https://github.com/Starch/test-ivy

 Comments   
Comment by Benjamin Muschko [ 15/Nov/16 ]

As announced on the Gradle blog we are planning to completely migrate issues from JIRA to GitHub.

We intend to prioritize issues that are actionable and impactful while working more closely with the community. Many of our JIRA issues are inactionable or irrelevant. We would like to request your help to ensure we can appropriately prioritize JIRA issues you’ve contributed to.

Please confirm that you still advocate for your JIRA issue before December 10th, 2016 by:

  • Checking that your issues contain requisite context, impact, behaviors, and examples as described in our published guidelines.
  • Leave a comment on the JIRA issue or open a new GitHub issue confirming that the above is complete.

We look forward to collaborating with you more closely on GitHub. Thank you for your contribution to Gradle!

Comment by Benjamin Muschko [ 10/Feb/17 ]

Thanks again for reporting this issue. We haven't heard back from you after our inquiry from November 15th. We are closing this issue now. Please create an issue on GitHub if you still feel passionate about getting it resolved.

Generated at Wed Jun 30 12:43:45 CDT 2021 using Jira 8.4.2#804003-sha1:d21414fc212e3af190e92c2d2ac41299b89402cf.