[GRADLE-2677] Tooling API: Expose information about buildSrc (if any) Created: 12/Feb/13 Updated: 02/Feb/17 Resolved: 02/Feb/17 |
|
Status: | Resolved |
Project: | Gradle |
Affects Version/s: | 1.4 |
Fix Version/s: | None |
Type: | Bug | ||
Reporter: | Denis Zhdanov | Assignee: | Unassigned |
Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 10 |
Description |
Gradle references says the following:
It looks like an implicitly configured gradle sub-project then. However, tooling api doesn't expose any information about it. Looks like a bug. Implied by the ticket IDEA-98930 |
Comments |
Comment by Ryan Ernst [ 23/Sep/15 ] |
Any comment here from gradle folks? This makes developing a large project with buildSrc a pain. Either it is added as a module (which causes warnings/errors in the editor because each class shows up twice, once through the implicit buildSrc dependency, and another in the "extra" module), or it must be setup as a completely separate intellij workspace. I would assume if the tooling api exposed information about buildSrc, it could be setup in intellij so editing could take place without errors, in the same workspace. |
Comment by Benjamin Muschko [ 15/Nov/16 ] |
As announced on the Gradle blog we are planning to completely migrate issues from JIRA to GitHub. We intend to prioritize issues that are actionable and impactful while working more closely with the community. Many of our JIRA issues are inactionable or irrelevant. We would like to request your help to ensure we can appropriately prioritize JIRA issues you’ve contributed to. Please confirm that you still advocate for your JIRA issue before December 10th, 2016 by:
We look forward to collaborating with you more closely on GitHub. Thank you for your contribution to Gradle! |
Comment by Benjamin Muschko [ 02/Feb/17 ] |
I believe this has been fixed with the following: https://docs.gradle.org/3.3-rc-1/release-notes.html#tooling-api-generates-more-progress-events I am not quite sure if IntelliJ already leverages the new functionality but generally speaking they should be able to. Please open an issue on GitHub if you think that the use case hasn't been fulfilled. |