[GRADLE-2340] API consistency - dependencies expressed with 'group' and 'name', excludes with 'group' and 'module' Created: 08/Jun/12 Updated: 10/Feb/17 Resolved: 10/Feb/17 |
|
Status: | Resolved |
Project: | Gradle |
Affects Version/s: | 1.0-rc-3 |
Fix Version/s: | None |
Type: | Improvement | ||
Reporter: | wujek srujek | Assignee: | Unassigned |
Resolution: | Won't Fix | Votes: | 0 |
Description |
Hi. Take a look at the following snippet: configurations { testCompile.exclude group: 'junit', module: 'junit' }dependencies { groovy group: 'org.codehaus.groovy', name: 'groovy', version: '1.8.6' testCompile group: 'org.testng', name: 'testng', version: '6.5.2' testCompile group: 'org.mockito', name: 'mockito-core', version: '1.9.0' }The API is inconsistent: deps use 'group' and 'name' attributes, but excludes use 'group' and 'module'. This is a cause of build bugs that are not that require the user to go and google and dig in the API doc to find the right syntax, whereas it could be made consistent and what users expect. wujek |
Comments |
Comment by wujek srujek [ 15/Jun/13 ] |
Hi. It's been a year without even a comment. Any thoughts on the API inconsistency? Or is it by design? Would love to know. |
Comment by wujek srujek [ 15/Jun/13 ] |
Is anybody getting any updates to this bug? There is no assignee and no other watchers as me, so maybe nobody even noticed this ticket? |
Comment by Benjamin Muschko [ 15/Nov/16 ] |
As announced on the Gradle blog we are planning to completely migrate issues from JIRA to GitHub. We intend to prioritize issues that are actionable and impactful while working more closely with the community. Many of our JIRA issues are inactionable or irrelevant. We would like to request your help to ensure we can appropriately prioritize JIRA issues you’ve contributed to. Please confirm that you still advocate for your JIRA issue before December 10th, 2016 by:
We look forward to collaborating with you more closely on GitHub. Thank you for your contribution to Gradle! |
Comment by Benjamin Muschko [ 10/Feb/17 ] |
Thanks again for reporting this issue. We haven't heard back from you after our inquiry from November 15th. We are closing this issue now. Please create an issue on GitHub if you still feel passionate about getting it resolved. |