[GRADLE-1969] Crossed runtime/compile dependencies between projects cause circular dependencies between compile and JAR tasks Created: 28/Nov/11 Updated: 24/Jan/17 Resolved: 24/Jan/17 |
|
Status: | Resolved |
Project: | Gradle |
Affects Version/s: | 1.0-milestone-6 |
Fix Version/s: | None |
Type: | Bug | ||
Reporter: | Mauro Molinari | Assignee: | Unassigned |
Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 7 |
Attachments: | GRADLE-1969.zip |
Description |
Consider the attached multiproject. Project A has a compile dependency on B. B has no compile dependencies. That is, A and B can be compiled together on their own. Then, B has a runtime dependency on C. So, at runtime, B needs C to work, C needs A and A needs B. Yes, there's a circular dependency here, but it's a runtime circular dependency that shouldn't be a problem at build time and Java can handle it. However, at build time Gradle says that these dependencies cause a circular dependency between :A:compileJava task and :A:jar task. While I know that it's not ideal to have such a runtime circular dependency, I think that there shouldn't be any problem at build time and that Gradle could at most print a warning, but go ahead and build. |
Comments |
Comment by Mauro Molinari [ 20/Jul/12 ] |
Any news on this? |
Comment by Mathias Birkkjær Nielsen [ 28/May/15 ] |
Is this somehow solved another place, or is it obvious to everyone else that this should never happen. In my end-to-end tests I have abstracted my drivers into guiDrivers and programmaticDrivers. I therefore have the following modules: ':drivers' ':drivers' has a static method that instanciate the main gui- or programmatic driver. ':gui-drivers' has: compile project(':drivers') Ofcause I could make a fourth module with only the static method. But that seems kind of overkill? |
Comment by Benjamin Muschko [ 15/Nov/16 ] |
As announced on the Gradle blog we are planning to completely migrate issues from JIRA to GitHub. We intend to prioritize issues that are actionable and impactful while working more closely with the community. Many of our JIRA issues are inactionable or irrelevant. We would like to request your help to ensure we can appropriately prioritize JIRA issues you’ve contributed to. Please confirm that you still advocate for your JIRA issue before December 10th, 2016 by:
We look forward to collaborating with you more closely on GitHub. Thank you for your contribution to Gradle! |
Comment by Mauro Molinari [ 15/Nov/16 ] |
This is still reproducible in recent Gradle. |
Comment by Benjamin Muschko [ 24/Jan/17 ] |
This use case should be solvable with the upcoming feature "Java Library Plugin" in Gradle 3.4-RC1. Please try that as soon as we release the version. This should happen by the end of the week. Please open a new issue on GitHub if the functionality doesn't solve your use case. |