What is your preferred policy regarding adding javadoc to setters and getters? I had a look at the Spring project. The code I have reviewed puts the extensive docs into the setter. The getter get's only basic coverage and links to the setter.

We have added a lot of Javadoc but the process is not finished yet. In particular the tasks need more javadoc. I leave this to 0.4, as most of the tasks are still in Groovy. In 0.4. they will be refactored to Java.

We don't need this as a specific issue any longer.