[GRADLE-990] adding a project dependency should implicitly add a evaluationDependsOn on that project as well Created: 18/Jun/10 Updated: 10/Feb/17 Resolved: 10/Feb/17 |
|
Status: | Resolved |
Project: | Gradle |
Affects Version/s: | None |
Fix Version/s: | None |
Type: | Improvement | ||
Reporter: | Steve Ebersole | Assignee: | Unassigned |
Resolution: | Won't Fix | Votes: | 1 |
Attachments: | gradle_dependencies_test.zip |
Description |
The specific issue I ran into had to do with custom sourceSets. For example, I have a project called 'hibernate-core' which defines: sourceSets { testing { ... } intgTest { ... } } Another project in this build defines: dependencies { compile( project(':hibernate-core') ) testCompile( project(':hibernate-core').sourceSets.testing.classes ) ... } Which fails because apparently Gradle did not know about this custom 'testing' source set while evaluating the above project and I had to explicitly say: dependencies { compile( project(':hibernate-core') ) testCompile( project(':hibernate-core').sourceSets.testing.classes ) ... } evaluationDependsOn( ':hibernate-core' ) To me this seems redundant and unnecessary. |
Comments |
Comment by Balázs Mihály [ 07/Jan/13 ] |
I ran into a similar problem while trying to add manifest classpath to a jar. service:
dependencies {
compile 'foo:bar:1.0.0'
}
cmdapp: dependencies { compile project(':service') } jar { manifest { attributes 'Main-Class': foo.bar.Main attributes 'Class-Path': project.configurations.runtime.collect { it.getName() }.join(' ') } } The problem is that the runtime dependencies of cmdapp will be incomplete. The (transitive) dependencies of Service aren't in the tree. |
Comment by Balázs Mihály [ 07/Jan/13 ] |
A little working example for my comment. |
Comment by Balázs Mihály [ 16/Jan/13 ] |
OK, I've found the real solution for my problem (to be more precise "one" solution, there is at least one other good solution). I don't delete my previous comments, maybe they can help for somebody. jar.doFirst { manifest { attributes 'Main-Class': foo.bar.Main attributes 'Class-Path': project.configurations.runtime.collect { it.getName() }.join(' ') } } With this method the runtime configurations don't have to be evaluated in script evaluation time. |
Comment by Szczepan Faber [ 12/Feb/13 ] |
@Balzas, the pattern with doFirst is a good one for this case. This way, the resolution happens at execution time. @Steve, there are other solutions for this scenario. The test utility classes can be moved to a separate subproject. Another solution is to publish the utility classes in a separate configuration: testCompile project(path: ':hibernate-core', configuration: 'testing') Access other project's model like project(':hibernate-core').sourceSets... is not really recommended as it inflexibly couples the projects. The recommended way of coupling projects are the project dependencies. Hope that helps! |
Comment by Benjamin Muschko [ 15/Nov/16 ] |
As announced on the Gradle blog we are planning to completely migrate issues from JIRA to GitHub. We intend to prioritize issues that are actionable and impactful while working more closely with the community. Many of our JIRA issues are inactionable or irrelevant. We would like to request your help to ensure we can appropriately prioritize JIRA issues you’ve contributed to. Please confirm that you still advocate for your JIRA issue before December 10th, 2016 by:
We look forward to collaborating with you more closely on GitHub. Thank you for your contribution to Gradle! |
Comment by Benjamin Muschko [ 10/Feb/17 ] |
Thanks again for reporting this issue. We haven't heard back from you after our inquiry from November 15th. We are closing this issue now. Please create an issue on GitHub if you still feel passionate about getting it resolved. |