[GRADLE-935] Ivy.xml file created with 1.0 ivy-module version rather than 2.0 Created: 10/May/10 Updated: 10/Feb/17 Resolved: 10/Feb/17 |
|
Status: | Resolved |
Project: | Gradle |
Affects Version/s: | 0.8, 0.9 |
Fix Version/s: | None |
Type: | Bug | ||
Reporter: | Michael Parmeley | Assignee: | Unassigned |
Resolution: | Won't Fix | Votes: | 2 |
Attachments: | Screen shot 2010-06-08 at 9.26.12 AM.png |
Description |
When running the uploadArchives task the ivy.xml file is created with a 1.0 ivy module version, it is created as: <ivy-module version="1.0"> Should be: <ivy-module version="2.0"> |
Comments |
Comment by Hans Dockter [ 07/Jun/10 ] |
The ivy modules generated with ivy 2.1.0 use 1.0 for the ivy-module version. Why should it be 2.0? |
Comment by Michael Parmeley [ 08/Jun/10 ] |
This page shows that the version attribute for ivy-module should be 2.0 for Ivy 2.1.0 (see attached screenshot): http://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/latest-milestone/ivyfile.html |
Comment by Hans Dockter [ 24/Jun/10 ] |
I see your point. The strange thing is that ivy internally still uses 1.0 when producing ivy.xml files. See https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/ivy/core/tags/2.1.0/src/java/org/apache/ivy/plugins/parser/xml/XmlModuleDescriptorWriter.java and the write method. The ivy-module version is hard coded. Therefore I postpone this issue to 1.0. I have filed an Ivy Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-1199 |
Comment by Hans Dockter [ 28/Jun/10 ] |
IVY-1199 is fixed. So as soon as we switch to the yet to be released Ivy-2.2.0 this will be solved. |
Comment by Benjamin Muschko [ 15/Nov/16 ] |
As announced on the Gradle blog we are planning to completely migrate issues from JIRA to GitHub. We intend to prioritize issues that are actionable and impactful while working more closely with the community. Many of our JIRA issues are inactionable or irrelevant. We would like to request your help to ensure we can appropriately prioritize JIRA issues you’ve contributed to. Please confirm that you still advocate for your JIRA issue before December 10th, 2016 by:
We look forward to collaborating with you more closely on GitHub. Thank you for your contribution to Gradle! |
Comment by Benjamin Muschko [ 10/Feb/17 ] |
Thanks again for reporting this issue. We haven't heard back from you after our inquiry from November 15th. We are closing this issue now. Please create an issue on GitHub if you still feel passionate about getting it resolved. |