[GRADLE-756] Conditional artifact publication Created: 27/Nov/09 Updated: 10/Feb/17 Resolved: 10/Feb/17 |
|
Status: | Resolved |
Project: | Gradle |
Affects Version/s: | None |
Fix Version/s: | None |
Type: | Improvement | ||
Reporter: | Ross Black | Assignee: | Unassigned |
Resolution: | Won't Fix | Votes: | 2 |
Description |
Is there a way to conditionally add an artifact to a configuration, where the condition is evaluated at runtime? I was hoping the following would work (but it does not): Task apiTask = project.task('apiJar', type: Jar, dependsOn: 'classes') { fileSet(dir: project.apiClassesDir) }apiTask.onlyIf {project.apiClassesDir.exists()}project.artifacts { api apiTask }— The apiJar task correctly only generates the jar if the directory exists, but the artifact handler always expects that the file specified by the apiJar task exists even if the task has not run. |
Comments |
Comment by Ross Black [ 27/Nov/09 ] |
There is a work around, not a good one though. // This action only executes if apiTask is not skipped } uploadApi { |
Comment by Ross Black [ 27/Nov/09 ] |
This seems to be related to |
Comment by Hans Dockter [ 22/Apr/10 ] |
Not creating an empty jar would be a work around. We probably won't fix this for 0.9. But there is an easy way to achieve this functionality: doLast { // if the jar just contains the manifest if (inputs.files.files.size() == 1) { delete(archivePath) } } What we will provide in 1.0 is a way to express your requirement explicitly. |
Comment by Benjamin Muschko [ 15/Nov/16 ] |
As announced on the Gradle blog we are planning to completely migrate issues from JIRA to GitHub. We intend to prioritize issues that are actionable and impactful while working more closely with the community. Many of our JIRA issues are inactionable or irrelevant. We would like to request your help to ensure we can appropriately prioritize JIRA issues you’ve contributed to. Please confirm that you still advocate for your JIRA issue before December 10th, 2016 by:
We look forward to collaborating with you more closely on GitHub. Thank you for your contribution to Gradle! |
Comment by Benjamin Muschko [ 10/Feb/17 ] |
Thanks again for reporting this issue. We haven't heard back from you after our inquiry from November 15th. We are closing this issue now. Please create an issue on GitHub if you still feel passionate about getting it resolved. |