[GRADLE-714] Allow tasks to use files with a specific 'ivy type' from a configuration Created: 22/Oct/09 Updated: 10/Feb/17 Resolved: 10/Feb/17 |
|
Status: | Resolved |
Project: | Gradle |
Affects Version/s: | 0.8 |
Fix Version/s: | None |
Type: | Improvement | ||
Reporter: | Ross Black | Assignee: | Unassigned |
Resolution: | Won't Fix | Votes: | 4 |
Description |
Allow some way for tasks (eg compile) and other code to specify that they use a subset of files from a configuration based on ivy type. eg Using an existing ivy repository that uses ivy types to group files within a single configuration: <configurations> Currently the compile tasks will include the jar, the source zip, and the html licence on the classpath. It appears as if the only way to extract the files files by ivy type is similar to the following gradle code: task resolve << { Set<ResolvedArtifact> artifacts = configurations.testCompile.resolvedConfiguration.resolvedArtifacts def typedArtifacts = artifacts.findAll { artifact -> artifact.type == 'license' } println("Artifacts = " + ResolvedDependencies.getFilesFromArtifacts(typedArtifacts)) – |
Comments |
Comment by Jacob Aleksynas [ 30/Apr/12 ] |
An would be a welcome addition to the DSL. particularly with large existing repositories that have heavily leveraged the type in ivy. |
Comment by Benjamin Muschko [ 15/Nov/16 ] |
As announced on the Gradle blog we are planning to completely migrate issues from JIRA to GitHub. We intend to prioritize issues that are actionable and impactful while working more closely with the community. Many of our JIRA issues are inactionable or irrelevant. We would like to request your help to ensure we can appropriately prioritize JIRA issues you’ve contributed to. Please confirm that you still advocate for your JIRA issue before December 10th, 2016 by:
We look forward to collaborating with you more closely on GitHub. Thank you for your contribution to Gradle! |
Comment by Benjamin Muschko [ 10/Feb/17 ] |
Thanks again for reporting this issue. We haven't heard back from you after our inquiry from November 15th. We are closing this issue now. Please create an issue on GitHub if you still feel passionate about getting it resolved. |