[GRADLE-2514] afterEvaluate closure not executed when evaluationDependsOn is specified Created: 09/Oct/12 Updated: 10/Feb/17 Resolved: 10/Feb/17 |
|
Status: | Resolved |
Project: | Gradle |
Affects Version/s: | 1.2 |
Fix Version/s: | None |
Type: | Bug | ||
Reporter: | Alex L | Assignee: | Unassigned |
Resolution: | Won't Fix | Votes: | 0 |
Issue Links: |
|
Description |
In a multi-project build, if there is an afterEvaluate closure defined for all subprojects, adding an evaluationDependsOn clause will cause the afterEvaluate closure to be skipped. The correct behaviour would be for the afterEvaluate closure to be executed for all subprojects, no matter others subprojects' evaluation depend on them. For example, supposing we have the following setup: settings.gradle include 'A', 'B', 'C', 'D' build.gradle subprojects { //println "Init: $project.name" if( project.name == 'A' ) { evaluationDependsOn( ':B' ) evaluationDependsOn( ':D' ) } else if( project.name == 'D' ) { evaluationDependsOn( ':C' ) } afterEvaluate { subproject -> println "After eval: $subproject.name" } } task build; Running gradle -q build should yeld 4 lines: After eval: C After eval: D After eval: B After eval: A However, afterEvaluate is not executed for B and D, so it ends up with the following output: After eval: C After eval: A I don't see why this would be the intended functionality, so I believe it is a flaw in the project evaluation procedure. |
Comments |
Comment by Benjamin Muschko [ 15/Nov/16 ] |
As announced on the Gradle blog we are planning to completely migrate issues from JIRA to GitHub. We intend to prioritize issues that are actionable and impactful while working more closely with the community. Many of our JIRA issues are inactionable or irrelevant. We would like to request your help to ensure we can appropriately prioritize JIRA issues you’ve contributed to. Please confirm that you still advocate for your JIRA issue before December 10th, 2016 by:
We look forward to collaborating with you more closely on GitHub. Thank you for your contribution to Gradle! |
Comment by Benjamin Muschko [ 10/Feb/17 ] |
Thanks again for reporting this issue. We haven't heard back from you after our inquiry from November 15th. We are closing this issue now. Please create an issue on GitHub if you still feel passionate about getting it resolved. |