[GRADLE-2213] Standard jar task generates a jar with duplicate entries if we change the resource output folder. Created: 04/Apr/12 Updated: 10/Feb/17 Resolved: 10/Feb/17 |
|
Status: | Resolved |
Project: | Gradle |
Affects Version/s: | None |
Fix Version/s: | None |
Type: | Improvement | ||
Reporter: | Gradle Forums | Assignee: | Unassigned |
Resolution: | Won't Fix | Votes: | 8 |
Description |
Hi, we change the default resource output folder with: sourceSets.main.output.resourcesDir = sourceSets.main.output.classesDir and we have the problem, that the generated jar file has everything dupicated. Class files and resources. And I saw that we can't change the source property of the jar task because it's read only. How can we achieve that the standard jar task of the java plugin creates a correct jar file? Thanks in advance. Guy |
Comments |
Comment by Tinkerer [ 27/Jun/12 ] |
I have the same issue with my jar artifacts produced by my multi-project Gradle (M6) build - sourceSets { } commenting out the output.resourcesDir line produces the desired (jar) artifact. Do classesDir & resourcesDir need to point to different output paths? |
Comment by Paul Grove [ 30/Oct/13 ] |
This also occurs if the below is in your build file sourceSets { main{ output.resourcesDir = "build/classes/main" } test{ output.resourcesDir = "build/classes/test"} } |
Comment by Gui Forget [ 25/Oct/14 ] |
Issue # jar { duplicatesStrategy= DuplicatesStrategy.EXCLUDE } |
Comment by Benjamin Muschko [ 15/Nov/16 ] |
As announced on the Gradle blog we are planning to completely migrate issues from JIRA to GitHub. We intend to prioritize issues that are actionable and impactful while working more closely with the community. Many of our JIRA issues are inactionable or irrelevant. We would like to request your help to ensure we can appropriately prioritize JIRA issues you’ve contributed to. Please confirm that you still advocate for your JIRA issue before December 10th, 2016 by:
We look forward to collaborating with you more closely on GitHub. Thank you for your contribution to Gradle! |
Comment by Benjamin Muschko [ 10/Feb/17 ] |
Thanks again for reporting this issue. We haven't heard back from you after our inquiry from November 15th. We are closing this issue now. Please create an issue on GitHub if you still feel passionate about getting it resolved. |