[GRADLE-2128] Ivy resolver changingPattern is ignored if changingMatcher is not specified Created: 27/Feb/12 Updated: 10/Feb/17 Resolved: 10/Feb/17 |
|
Status: | Resolved |
Project: | Gradle |
Affects Version/s: | None |
Fix Version/s: | None |
Type: | Bug | ||
Reporter: | Gradle Forums | Assignee: | Unassigned |
Resolution: | Won't Fix | Votes: | 1 |
Attachments: | ChangingModuleTest.zip |
Description |
I define ivy resolvers directly still since the gradle ivy DSL does not yet have the changing* properties for ivy resolvers. It seems that with gradle-1.0-milestone-8 gradle has stopped honoring the changingPattern though. For instance, if I define a local filesystem resolver like so: add(new org.apache.ivy.plugins.resolver.FileSystemResolver()) { even if I set Gradle will never download a new jar with a -SNAPSHOT version. I have verified that if I use dynamic versions (i.e. latest.integration) and set the resolution strategy for dynamic versions it does work. Is there some way to communicate to gradle that it should honor the changing pattern of the ivy resolvers with the new resolution code? |
Comments |
Comment by Gradle Forums [ 27/Feb/12 ] |
Hi Sean, Can you confirm that this worked for `1.0-milestone-7`? |
Comment by Gradle Forums [ 27/Feb/12 ] |
I know it is working with milestone-6 and before, I will try it with milestone-7 and report back. |
Comment by Gradle Forums [ 27/Feb/12 ] |
I have the same problem with milestone-7. It seems to handle dynamic versions just fine, but not changingVersions. |
Comment by Gradle Forums [ 27/Feb/12 ] |
Thanks for taking the time to find that out. That will make it easier to track down. |
Comment by Detelin Yordanov [ 02/Mar/12 ] |
A sample test case to verify whether changing module dependencies are refreshed by Gradle when there are new versions on the repository.
The test case contains:
Please let me know if there are any misconfigurations or anything that needs to be changed, I also tried setting
resolutionStrategy {
cacheChangingModulesFor 0, 'seconds'
}
for the test module's buildscript configuration but it did not seem to help. Regards, |
Comment by Benjamin Muschko [ 15/Nov/16 ] |
As announced on the Gradle blog we are planning to completely migrate issues from JIRA to GitHub. We intend to prioritize issues that are actionable and impactful while working more closely with the community. Many of our JIRA issues are inactionable or irrelevant. We would like to request your help to ensure we can appropriately prioritize JIRA issues you’ve contributed to. Please confirm that you still advocate for your JIRA issue before December 10th, 2016 by:
We look forward to collaborating with you more closely on GitHub. Thank you for your contribution to Gradle! |
Comment by Benjamin Muschko [ 10/Feb/17 ] |
Thanks again for reporting this issue. We haven't heard back from you after our inquiry from November 15th. We are closing this issue now. Please create an issue on GitHub if you still feel passionate about getting it resolved. |