[GRADLE-2074] Missing WEB-INF/classes when setting a custom classpath Created: 31/Jan/12 Updated: 10/Feb/17 Resolved: 10/Feb/17 |
|
Status: | Resolved |
Project: | Gradle |
Affects Version/s: | 1.0-milestone-7 |
Fix Version/s: | None |
Type: | Bug | ||
Reporter: | Kirk Rasmussen | Assignee: | Unassigned |
Resolution: | Won't Fix | Votes: | 0 |
Description |
According to the documentation the default 'classpath' setting is 'project.configurations.runtime - project.configurations.providedRuntime', http://gradle.org/docs/current/dsl/org.gradle.api.tasks.bundling.War.html However when setting this value explicitly using the 'default' value it will generate a WAR which is missing WEB-INF/classes war { classpath = project.configurations.runtime - project.configurations.providedRuntime }My real goal is that I want to excluded Groovy (for a Groovy project destined for a OSGi bundle) from the WEB-INF/lib so I tried the following which worked but it also had the side effect of removing 'WEB-INF/classes' as well: war { // haque to exclude Groovy runtime from WEB-INF/lib/* classpath = project.configurations.runtime - project.configurations.providedRuntime - project.configurations.groovy } |
Comments |
Comment by Kirk Rasmussen [ 31/Jan/12 ] |
This is what I did as a workaround for now:
war {
classpath = []
from(sourceSets.main.output.classesDir) {
into('WEB-INF/classes')
}
}
|
Comment by Benjamin Muschko [ 15/Nov/16 ] |
As announced on the Gradle blog we are planning to completely migrate issues from JIRA to GitHub. We intend to prioritize issues that are actionable and impactful while working more closely with the community. Many of our JIRA issues are inactionable or irrelevant. We would like to request your help to ensure we can appropriately prioritize JIRA issues you’ve contributed to. Please confirm that you still advocate for your JIRA issue before December 10th, 2016 by:
We look forward to collaborating with you more closely on GitHub. Thank you for your contribution to Gradle! |
Comment by Benjamin Muschko [ 10/Feb/17 ] |
Thanks again for reporting this issue. We haven't heard back from you after our inquiry from November 15th. We are closing this issue now. Please create an issue on GitHub if you still feel passionate about getting it resolved. |