[GRADLE-1929] Support a configurations block inside a buildscript block Created: 14/Nov/11 Updated: 10/Feb/17 Resolved: 10/Feb/17 |
|
Status: | Resolved |
Project: | Gradle |
Affects Version/s: | 1.0-milestone-5 |
Fix Version/s: | None |
Type: | Improvement | ||
Reporter: | Daz DeBoer | Assignee: | Unassigned |
Resolution: | Won't Fix | Votes: | 1 |
Description |
For consistency, it should be possible to use a configurations {} block inside of a buildscript {} block. It is possible to manipulate the configurations, but the syntax inside a buildscript block is more limitied: buildscript { repositories { mavenCentral() } dependencies { classpath 'junit:junit:4.10' } // This works configurations.classpath.exclude group: 'org.hamcrest', module: 'hamcrest-core' // This doesn't configurations { classpath { exclude group: 'org.hamcrest', module: 'hamcrest-core' } } } task show << { println buildscript.configurations.classpath.files } |
Comments |
Comment by Benjamin Muschko [ 15/Nov/16 ] |
As announced on the Gradle blog we are planning to completely migrate issues from JIRA to GitHub. We intend to prioritize issues that are actionable and impactful while working more closely with the community. Many of our JIRA issues are inactionable or irrelevant. We would like to request your help to ensure we can appropriately prioritize JIRA issues you’ve contributed to. Please confirm that you still advocate for your JIRA issue before December 10th, 2016 by:
We look forward to collaborating with you more closely on GitHub. Thank you for your contribution to Gradle! |
Comment by Benjamin Muschko [ 10/Feb/17 ] |
Thanks again for reporting this issue. We haven't heard back from you after our inquiry from November 15th. We are closing this issue now. Please create an issue on GitHub if you still feel passionate about getting it resolved. |